The world is in crisis due to five other problems besides the corona virus epidemic

The Corona virus epidemic is making headlines in many parts of the world, and perhaps the reason is understandable.

Because this epidemic is affecting the whole world, many questions are being raised about how to deal with this crisis, how to change and manage our societies in the face of this epidemic and how to continue our daily activities.   Many global problems have been left behind since the onset of the epidemic, and it may be too late to address them.  Some problems have become more serious, while some governments are using the Corona virus epidemic to divert attention from their long-held aspirations.  Here are five global issues that need to be addressed in the coming days.

(1)

The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which bans long-range nuclear missiles, expires in February next year. Time is running out if the treaty is to be renegotiated, one of the last post-Cold War arms control agreements. Following the termination of the agreement, a new global arms race is expected to begin due to a lack of transparency and restrictions on arms procurement.  In fact, the development of secret weapons, such as high-velocity missiles, adds to the danger in this race.  Russia appears to be ready again for the deal, which will be a simple paperwork. However, President Trump's administration seems to want to delay the inclusion of China in the agreement.  China has no intention of joining the agreement, so it is too late to write a new and comprehensive agreement.  So if the United States does not change its mind at the last minute, it seems that this New Start Agreement will become history.

 (2)

A good deal is about to be ruined by the issue of US withdrawal from the JCPOA agreement, which seeks to curb Iran's nuclear activities. The United Nations is currently facing a wide-ranging ban on the sale of sophisticated weapons to Iran by various countries.  But a ban on the sale of sophisticated weapons to Iran expires on October 18 this year under a resolution passed in support of the UN nuclear deal. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani  has already warned that if the United States succeeds in renewing the embargo, it will have "serious" consequences. However, it is unlikely that Russia will agree to renew the arms embargo, in which case President Trump would like European countries to work out a mechanism for the nuclear deal so that the economic imposition on Iran Restrictions can be maintained that will be lifted with the agreement expiring this year. President Trump's strategy is not unique. The United States has already withdrawn from the Iran nuclear deal and has been increasing pressure on Iran ever since. Iran has also deviated from many of the terms of the agreement. Now the United States is saying that Iran must abide by the agreement with which the United States has withdrawn or face new sanctions. According to a senior official in former US President Barak Osama’s administration, this is an attempt by the Trump administration to "take advantage."  Relations between the United States and Iran will deteriorate further and tensions between the United States and its European allies will increase. And the ban on arms sales does not significantly change Iran's regional approach, nor does it affect its ability to use proxies.

(3)

Israel follows a power-sharing deal with a major Israeli opposition political party   Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has retained his post after a long series of election campaigns ended. Despite pending lawsuits against them, and perhaps because of them, Netanyahu is pursuing a controversial national agenda under which Israel seeks to settle in the occupied West Bank in order to permanently occupy that part of Israel. To be part of Apparently, this will put an end to the debate on a "two state solution" between Palestine and Israel forever. Despite the provisions in US President Donald Trump's peace plan, the move is aimed at those who want a lasting peace between Israel and Palestine. Wanting to see is losing hope. Palestinians themselves are already protesting the issue, and other governments, including Europe, are urging caution, and in some cases talking about possible sanctions if the policy goes ahead. As always, America's position on this issue will be very important. Will he give the green light to Israel to do all this or will he adopt a strategy to stop it? It is clear that Prime Minister Netanyahu has been encouraged by President Trump's decisions to annex Israel to the Golan Heights in occupied Syria and move the US embassy to Jerusalem. However, the United States' current stance on the move is unclear, suggesting that if Israel is willing to negotiate a Palestinian state, the United States could conditionally support Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Some experts believe that Netanyahu may find a way to back away from his position after using the West Bank settlement issue to mobilize nationalist support in the election campaign. Perhaps the Americans will help them because hardline Israeli nationalists are not in favor of tolerating a Palestinian state under any circumstances. But whatever it is, the journey ahead will be difficult and arduous.

(4)

Many of us have forgotten the term Bridget, but time is running out. The UK's transition period from the European Union will end on December 31 this year. Negotiations on the terms of their future relationship have begun temporarily, but there is no indication that Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government is considering any delays or extensions in this transitional phase. However, the Corona epidemic, which has sparked an economic crisis that could take years to recover, has changed Bridget's entire outlook. There are no signs of a resurgence of the old debate in the UK, but time is running out. Although the initial reaction of the EU countries to the Code 19 crisis was not good, it has improved over time. The epidemic is not over yet and the UK itself has not set a significant example in dealing with the crisis.  Britain's exit from the EU will affect both sides and may lead to a more consensual view of the nature of their future relations. But in a recessionary and less hospitable world, it will be difficult for Britain to make such economic and diplomatic decisions as to how much to support the Americans or when to stand up to China.

(5)

The global response to the Corona epidemic is, in fact, a measure of the global community's ability to tackle the larger and more complex global challenge of climate change. If we talk about the joint cooperation of nations, then in the light of the experiences of Code-19, so far mixed news has emerged and the tensions that have arisen now are likely to remain in the post-epidemic world. And will complicate matters further. It is one thing to resume the "process" of talking about climate change, but it is another thing to postpone the important UN meeting, the COP 26 Climate Conference, which was to be held in Glasgow in November this year, until next year. Has been given.  But the question that still exists is how will global thinking change? Even after the epidemic, will the world think about the goals of climate change and its urgent need?  And how long will the New World Order make any progress on this important and extremely complex issue?