A man reads the paper in Morocco on January 11, 2010. Photo
In the “war” against COVID-19, a number of
governments in the Middle East are banning print journalism “until further
notice.”
The media
sector and press, in particular, were already in bad shape in the Middle East and North Africa region
(MENA). Like elsewhere, years of falling revenues, digitalization, poor quality
content and co-option by authorities have led to a decrease both in the number
of printed newspapers and readership.
COVID-19 is the latest blow to
the print journalism sector. With several governments across the region
suspending print newspapers, printed media is a silent victim of the
virus:
March
17, 2020: In Jordan, the
Jordanian Council of Ministers suspended the publication of all newspapers “because they
help the transmission of the pandemic“.
March
22, 2020: In Oman, the Supreme
Committee for Dealing with COVID-19 ordered all newspapers, magazines and other publications to
cease printing and circulating. In Morocco, the Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports, suspended all publication and distribution of printed
editions because “a large number of people use print paper on a daily basis,
this contributes to the spread of the virus, making it necessary to ban the paper
to protect the health of citizens.”
March
23, 2020: In Yemen, the minister of
communications from the internationally-recognized Hadi government issued a decree suspending print newspapers as a
preventive measure to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
March
24, 2020: In the UAE, the National Media
Council has stopped the distribution of all print newspapers and magazines.
The
succession of prohibitions, across the region, against print newspapers further
destabilize further a fragile industry and cause a vacuum in information
circulation.
For
journalists already battling precarious working conditions, these shutdowns
will inflict serious financial repercussions if not redundancy.
The Jordanian
Syndicate of Journalists has called on the government to urgently support the sector
and save the journalists. “Hundreds of journalists and workers in the print
industry are without income and may lose their jobs,” the syndicate said,
adding that the government should “find adequate measures that will allow print
newspapers to resume [publication].’’
For readers,
these measures negatively impact their right to access information. The ban in Yemen, for example, has an
even deeper impact as internet penetration is low at just 25% in 2019, — and mainly concentrated among
youth in urban areas. It is not clear how and if print readership will shift to
online media and who will fill in this vacuum.
Having access
to reliable fact-based information is essential, especially during a crisis
when people turn to the media to understand the situation and get practical
information. Yet, most governments in the region — perpetuating old
authoritarian practices — have instead attempted to control and restrict
freedom of expression.
In reality,
there is no evidence or correlation between the circulation of print
newspapers and the spread of COVID 19. It has been deemed safe to receive packages such as
newspapers, even from areas that have reported high cases of COVID-19.
According to
the World Health Organization (WHO):
The likelihood of an infected person
contaminating commercial goods is low and the risk of catching the virus that
causes COVID-19 from a package that
has been moved, travelled, and exposed to different conditions and temperature
is also low.
Therefore,
decisions to shut down print papers is possibly politically motivated and not
based on scientific evidence.
Other
countries affected by the COVID-19 pandemic have chosen a
different approach. Even in Italy, the epicenter of the crisis with a death toll nearing 20,000 and quarantine rules strictly enforced,
newspapers have continued to publish and print.
In France, also badly hit by
the virus, newspaper vendors have been categorised as
“essential business” and allowed to stay open. Different sectors, local
councils, delivery companies, distributors have allied to ensure print
newspapers are available to the public.
In the United Kingdom,
the free daily Metro and Evening Standard print newspaper, widely distributed
in tube stations to commuters, have lost a large audience with the lockdown.
They are now distributing in supermarkets and delivering
door-to-door.
These few
examples demonstrate collective efforts to keep the public informed. The free
flow of information is preserved and contributes to building resilience in a
crisis.
The Middle
East has not taken this approach.
Their
response to major challenges like COVID
19 is
a repeated scenario of repression and control. Human Rights and freedom of expression
are being crushed without much opposition or outcry.
While
in Iraq, protesters continue to defy the
lockdown and clash with the police to protest the assassination of
anti-government activists, political movements and protests in Algeria and Lebanon were thwarted with the adoption of social distancing and
bans on gatherings.
An Algerian activist,
who requested to remain anonymous, told Global Voices:
They could not have dreamed of it. This virus
is a benediction for the authorities. It gave them the excuse to stop us
gathering and protesting for change that in other circumstances we
would never have accepted.
Now that
print is dead in some countries in the region, there is no guarantee that it
will appear again. As there is no timeline or indication of when and if
newspapers will be able, one day, to be in kiosks again, could the simple
act of picking up a print newspaper or magazine become a distant memory in
countries like Jordan, Yemen,
Morocco?
0 Comments